Topic: nuclear weapons

Will the NSA Revelations Harm US-China Relations?

Huffington Post (June 18, 2013)

View original publication

The startling revelations about massive U.S. surveillance programs run by the National Security Agency emerged in early June just as President Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping were about to begin their informal summit meeting where cyberespionage was high on the agenda. While the Obama-Xi summit succeeded on several levels, the two leaders made no discernible progress on cyber… Read more »

Creating a New Model for U.S.-China Relations at the Obama-Xi Summit

Huffington Post (June 4, 2013)

View original publication

This week’s summit meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and President Barack Obama offers a historic opportunity to improve U.S.-China relations – but only if both sides frankly discuss the critical issues now dividing them and lay the basis for an ongoing process of mutual threat reduction. Fortunately, there is one major area where the two leaders… Read more »

After the Nuclear Test: Countering the Threat From North Korea

Huffington Post (February 12, 2013)

View original publication

China’s decision in late January to back the United States in expanding UN sanctions against North Korea underscores the value of improving U.S.-China relations in President Barack Obama’s second term and opens a new avenue for more effective diplomacy to counter Pyongyang’s weapons programs, following its nuclear test in flagrant violation of UN Security Council resolutions.

The Way Forward: Six Party Talks, a Peace Regime, and Regional Security Architecture in Northeast Asia

Jeju Peace Institute (August 6, 2010)

View original publication

In the U.S. foreign policy community, permanent peace arrangements in Korea are normally considered a means for helping to resolve the nuclear issue with North Korea. Advocates of a peace regime, including myself, have generally embraced the view that if South Korea and North Korea could reach a comprehensive settlement of outstanding security issues, with the assistance and participation of the United States and China, this settlement would effectively resolve the nuclear issue and lead to the creation of a forum for multilateral security cooperation in Northeast Asia.

North Korea and the Importance of Arms Control

Nautilus Institute (June 25, 2009)

View original publication

Approximately four weeks after North Korea’s nuclear test, the Obama administration has adopted the hard line approach to Pyongyang advocated by former Vice President Dick Cheney and his conservative allies. Sadly, the administration’s new policy rejects the fundamental premises of arms control that have guided the U.S. government since the early 1970s.

Hyping North Korea’s Nuclear Threat

Foreign Policy / Newsweek Japan (May 26, 2009)

View original publication

Let’s be honest: North Korea’s nuclear test on Sunday does not, as U.S. President Barack Obama put it, “pose a grave threat to the peace and stability of the world” much beyond the threat that North Korea posed on Saturday — the day before it conducted the test. And hyping the test, as Obama did in his White House statement, actually makes matters worse.

U.S.-Korea Relations: North Disables Facilities, But Resists Declaration

Comparative Connections (January 2008)

View original publication

North Korea followed through on its Oct. 3 commitment to disable its nuclear facilities this quarter, but resisted giving a “complete and correct” declaration of its nuclear programs. At the end of the quarter, the U.S. faced a diplomatic dilemma: how to incentivize Pyongyang to continue the disabling process, while pressuring North Korea to come clean on its past nuclear activities.

U.S.-Korea Relations: Agreement with the North, Progress with the South

Comparative Connections (October 2007)

View original publication

In an historic breakthrough at the Six-Party Talks, North Korea committed to disabling its Yongbyon nuclear facilities and declaring all its nuclear programs by Dec. 31, 2007. It also pledged not to transfer nuclear materials, technology, or know-how. In exchange, the U.S. agreed to move toward normalizing relations with Pyongyang by fulfilling its commitment to take North Korea off the list of state sponsors of terrorism and end the application of the U.S. Trading with the Enemy Act as Pyongyang fulfills its denuclearization commitments.

A Framework for Peace and Security in Korea and Northeast Asia

Global Asia (Fall 2007)

View original publication

After more than nine months of deliberations, a nonpartisan working group, organized by the Atlantic Council, has concluded that the US should now seek a comprehensive settlement in Korea – the major aspects of which are outlined below – that builds on but also goes beyond the administration’s February 2007 political decision to move ahead on nuclear negotiations with North Korea.